##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Many researchers have already shown that only user-based or content-based features are not enough to detect rumor in social media and for better prediction we need to consider both. In our research, we argue that the word embedding feature and sentiment score with subjectivity can also play a vital role in this detection task. Moreover, to detect the rumor at a very early stage and debunk it we may need to make the detection framework portable to legitimate users. This critical situation demands a secure implementation of rumor detection framework so that the user information used for training the prediction model can be protected from unauthorized access. In our experiment, we have also found that besides SVM, Logistic Regression and Random Forest algorithms, Artificial Neural Network and k-Nearest Neighbor can be used for rumor detection purpose where Artificial Neural Network and Random Forest outperformed (more than 90%) among all these algorithms in terms of accuracy. Other three algorithms also performed well with 80% or more accuracy level. To establish the robustness and efficiency of our proposed rumor detection mechanism, Precision, Recall, F1 Score, 10-fold Cross Validation, MCC, Confusion Matrix performance measures are used.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. H. Shaban, "Twitter reveals its daily active user numbers for the first time," Washington Post, 7 February 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/02/ 07/twitter-reveals-its-daily-active-user-numbers-first-time/ ?noredirect=on&utm_term= .90f3e88c6abc. [Accessed 20 April 2019].
     Google Scholar
  2. A. Y. K. Chua and S. Banerjee, "Rumors and rumor corrections on Twitter: Studying message characteristics and opinion leadership," in 2018 4th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM), Oxford, UK, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  3. Z. Zhe, R. Paul and M. Qiaozhu, "Enquiring Minds: Early Detection of Rumors in Social Media from Enquiry Posts," in Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, Florence, Italy, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  4. G. Liang, W. He, C. Xu, L. Chen and J. Zeng, "Rumor Identification in Microblogging Systems Based on Users? Behavior," IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 99-108, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  5. F. Chierichetti, S. Lattanzi and Alessandro Panconesi, "Rumor Spreading in Social Networks," in Automata, Languages and Programming, ICALP 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5556, A. M. Y. M. S. N. W. T. Susanne Albers, Ed., Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2009, pp. 375-386.
     Google Scholar
  6. A. Pal and A. Y. K. Chua, "Classification of rumors and counter-rumors," in 2018 4th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM), Oxford, UK, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  7. Y. Wang, J. Luo, R. Niemi, Y. Li and T. Hu, "Catching Fire via "Likes": Inferring Topic Preferences of Trump Followers on Twitter," CoRR, vol. abs/1603.03099, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  8. Z. Jin, J. Cao, H. Guo, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang and J. Luo, "Rumor Detection on Twitter Pertaining to the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election," CoRR, vol. abs/1701.06250, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  9. S. Krishnan and M. Chen, "Identifying Tweets with Fake News," in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI), Salt Lake City, Utah, USA , 2018.
     Google Scholar
  10. A. Zubiaga, M. Liakata and R. Procter, "Learning Reporting Dynamics during Breaking News for Rumour Detection in Social Media," CoRR, vol. abs/1610.07363, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  11. C. D. Manning, P. Raghavan and H. Sch?tze, Introduction to Information Retrieval, 1st ed., USA: Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 32-34.
     Google Scholar
  12. A. Vijeev, A. Mahapatra, A. Shyamkrishna and S. Murthy, "A Hybrid Approach to Rumour Detection in Microblogging Platforms," in 2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 2018.
     Google Scholar